Thank you, Graham, for your gentle response. Well, the fact that Jung had his own belief doesn’t mean that Jungianism theory implies that. Sorry, “partial” was an inadequate and, of course, wrong word; yes, you suggested, not tried to prove your thesis. I wrote that you were leading to a previously aim was not for what you wrote in the last one, but the way you announced it in the previous one, as something that would be suggestions contrary of the series up to there. Yes, you presented the ideas of physicists, followed by your critics showing the points each one had faults or intrinsic contradictions. A chapter that brilliantly closes the series with more arguments reinforcing your ideas throughout the series.